- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
The Role of Personal Values in Argument Evaluation
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Author's Profile
Other Versions
No versions found
Links
PhilArchive
External links
(no proxy)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Through your library
- Only published works are available at libraries.
My notes
Similar books and articles
Critical Thinking, Rational Evaluation, and Strong Poetry: A Response to Hatcher.Sharon Bailin - 1994 - Informal Logic 16 (3).
Are We Asking the Right Questions about Critical Thinking Assessment?David Wright - 2015 - Inquiry: Critical Thinking Across the Disciplines 30 (3):20-31.
Considering the roles of values in practical reasoning argumentation evaluation.Michael D. Baumtrog - 2013 - Virtues of Argumentation. Proceedings of the 10th International Conference of the Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation (OSSA).
Role of Moral Values in Evaluation of the Use of Nonhuman Animals in Research.Maria Botero & Donna Desforges - 2020 - Society and Animals 30 (4):386-403.
Review: William S. Hatcher, The Logical Foundations of Mathematics; William S. Hatcher, Foundations of Mathematics; William Hatcher's, Logical Foundations of Mathematics. [REVIEW]Frederick W. Kroon - 1986 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 51 (2):467-470.
The Rhetoric of Reason: Writing and the Attractions of Argument.James Crosswhite - 1996 - Madison, WI, USA: University of Wisconsin Press.
Personal values: Potential keys to ethical decision making. [REVIEW]David J. Fritzsche - 1995 - Journal of Business Ethics 14 (11):909 - 922.
The Role of Personal Values and Student Achievement in Academic Dishonesty.Maciej Koscielniak & Agnieszka Bojanowska - 2019 - Frontiers in Psychology 10.
Analytics
Added to PP
2015-04-02
Downloads
17 (#1,156,101)
6 months
6 (#873,397)
2015-04-02
Downloads
17 (#1,156,101)
6 months
6 (#873,397)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
Investigating the Shared Background Required for Argument: A Critique of Fogelin’s Thesis on Deep Disagreement.Dana Phillips - 2008 - Informal Logic 28 (2):86-101.
Critical Thinking Instruction.Donald Hatcher - 2015 - Inquiry: Critical Thinking Across the Disciplines 30 (3):4-19.
References found in this work
On the Very Idea of a Conceptual Scheme.Donald Davidson - 1973 - Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association 47:5-20.
Why Formal Logic is Essential for Critical Thinking.Donald L. Hatcher - 1999 - Informal Logic 19 (1).
Critical Thinking, Postmodernism, and Rational Evaluation.Donald L. Hatcher - 1994 - Informal Logic 16 (3).
Should Anti-Realists Teach Critical Thinking?Donald Hatcher - 1995 - Inquiry: Critical Thinking Across the Disciplines 14 (4):29-35.
Can Critical Thinking Survive the Postmodern Challenge?Donald Hatcher - 1991 - Inquiry: Critical Thinking Across the Disciplines 7 (1):8-9.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-667477cd97-lxkd2 dc2