What is said

Journal of Pragmatics 34 (8):969-991 (2002)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

A common misunderstanding of Grice's distinction between <br>saying and implicating is that the hearer in a conversation <br>needs to use what is said in a calculation to determine what <br>is implicated. This mistake lead some to misconstrue the relation <br>between pragmatics and semantics.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,888

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Pragmatics and Cognition: Intentions and Pattern Recognition in Context.Marco Mazzone - 2009 - International Review of Pragmatics 1 (2):321-347.
A place for pragmatism in the dynamics of reason?Thomas Mormann - 2012 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 43 (1):27-37.
Word Meaning, What is Said, and Explicature.Robyn Carston - 2013 - In Carlo Penco & Filippo Domaneschi (eds.), What Is Said and What Is Not: The Semantics/pragmatics Interface. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
The Pragmatics of What is Said.François Recanati - 1989 - Mind and Language 4 (4):295-329.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-04-28

Downloads
78 (#268,422)

6 months
78 (#79,302)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references