Relations Natural and Unnatural: A Response to John Boswell's Exegesis of Romans 1

Journal of Religious Ethics 14 (1):184 - 215 (1986)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

John Boswell's influential interpretation of Rom 1:26-27 is seriously misleading in several important particulars. A careful exegesis of the passage shows that Paul unambiguously describes homosexual behavior as a violation of God's intention for humankind. Responsible interpretation must first recognize that Paul condemns homosexuality and then ask how that condemnation bears upon the formation of normative ethical judgments. The final section of the essay offers some guidelines on the use of Romans 1 in Christian ethics.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,063

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-05-29

Downloads
187 (#129,105)

6 months
27 (#120,316)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Sexuality and Christian Tradition.David Newheiser - 2015 - Journal of Religious Ethics 43 (1):122-145.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references