Xenophobia and other reasons to wonder about the domain specificity of folk-biological classification

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (4):575-576 (1998)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Atran adds a synthesis of much of the literature on folk-biological classification to important new experimental data relevant to long-standing inferences about the structure of folk taxonomies. What we know about such systems is somewhat overstated, and key issues remain unresolved, especially concerning the centrality of “generic species,” the primacy of “general purpose” taxonomies, and domain specificity.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,561

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Folk taxonomies and folk theories: The case of Williams syndrome.Susan C. Johnson - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (4):578-579.
Taxonomic ranks, generic species, and core memes.Scott Atran - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (4):593-604.
Are folk taxonomies “memes”?Dan Sperber - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (4):589-590.
The living individual and its kind.Michael Thompson - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (4):591-591.
The case for general mechanisms in concept formation.Kenneth R. Livingston - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (4):581-582.
Atran’s Unnatural Kinds.David Davies - 2005 - Croatian Journal of Philosophy 5 (2):345-357.
What is empirical about Atran's taxonomies?Barbara Saunders - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (4):587-588.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
62 (#333,294)

6 months
9 (#439,903)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references