Contra Buridanum

Canadian Journal of Philosophy 17 (4):875 - 880 (1987)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The French philosopher Jean Buridan's work on the logical paradoxes is currently attracting more attention than it has for several centuries. In part this is due to a general resurgence of interest in the paradoxes, but the immediate occasion is the recent publication of G. E. Hughes's edition, translation, and commentary on the chapter of Buridan's Sophismata most immediately concerned with the paradoxes. It is worth noting, therefore, that Buridan's theory fails, and in a way that makes it seem unlikely that it can be developed into a serious rival of more modern theories.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,553

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-05-29

Downloads
62 (#347,765)

6 months
11 (#377,362)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Radical Anti‐Disquotationalism.Andrew Bacon - 2018 - Philosophical Perspectives 32 (1):41-107.
Truth and what is said.Elia Zardini - 2008 - Philosophical Perspectives 22 (1):545-574.
Gaps and Gluts: Reply to Parsons.Graham Priest - 1995 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 25 (1):57 - 66.
Pro Buridano; Contra Hazenum.Ian Hinckfuss - 1991 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 21 (3):389 - 398.

View all 8 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

Semantical paradox.Tyler Burge - 1979 - Journal of Philosophy 76 (4):169-198.
Handbook of Philosophical Logic.D. M. Gabbay & F. Guenthner - 2007 - Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 13 (2):248-250.
An abstraction algorithm for combinatory logic.S. Kamal Abdali - 1976 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 41 (1):222-224.

Add more references