The law of practice and localist neural network models

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (4):479-480 (2000)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

An extensive survey by Heathcote et al. (in press) found that the Law of Practice is closer to an exponential than a power form. We show that this result is hard to obtain for models using leaky competitive units when practice affects only the input, but that it can be accommodated when practice affects shunting self-excitation.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,516

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Hidden Markov model interpretations of neural networks.Ingmar Visser - 2000 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (4):494-495.
Practice, practice, practice – is that all it takes?Janet Starkes & Werner Helsen - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (3):425-425.
A competitive manifesto.R. Hans Phaf & Gezinus Wolters - 2000 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (4):487-488.
Localist models are already here.Stellan Ohlsson - 2000 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (4):486-487.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
33 (#679,146)

6 months
11 (#329,096)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

A Ballistic Model of Choice Response Time.Scott Brown & Andrew Heathcote - 2005 - Psychological Review 112 (1):117-128.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references