An addendum to the exchange with Walter hopp on phenomenology and fallibility

Husserl Studies 25 (1):51-55 (2009)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1007/s10743-008-9050-6

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,369

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

On Husserl’s Remark that “[s]elbst eine sich als apodiktisch ausgebende Evidenz kann sich als Täuschung enthüllen …” : Does the Phenomenological Method Yield Any Epistemic Infallibility? [REVIEW]George Heffernan - 2009 - Husserl Studies 25 (1):15-43.
New Yearbook for Phenomenology and Phenomenological Philosophy X (2010).Burt Hopkins & John Drummond - 2001 - Acumen Publishing.
Reply to Heffernan.Walter Hopp - 2009 - Husserl Studies 25 (1):45-49.
G. Heffernan, "Bedeutung und Evidenz bei Edmund Husserl". [REVIEW]R. Cobb-Stevens - 1985 - Husserl Studies 2 (2):225.
Two Conceptions of Husserlian Phenomenology: A Review of Walter Hopp’s Phenomenology: A Contemporary Introduction. [REVIEW]Jeff Yoshimi - 2021 - Husserl Studies 38 (1):87-95.
Walter Hopp , Perception and Knowledge . Reviewed by.Ryan Hickerson - 2013 - Philosophy in Review 33 (6):468-471.
Perception and Knowledge: A Phenomenological Account, by Walter Hopp. [REVIEW]M. K. Shim - 2012 - Mind 121 (481):187-190.
Phenomenology and fallibility.Walter Hopp - 2009 - Husserl Studies 25 (1):1-14.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-02-11

Downloads
86 (#245,201)

6 months
13 (#268,562)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

George Heffernan
Merrimack College

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references