Why Ethics Commissions? Four Normative Models

Res Publica 30 (1):67-85 (2024)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Ethics commissions are government advisory commissions mandated to give expert advice on contentious moral issues. As this requires making explicit value judgments, members with expert knowledge of ethics have a natural place as members of such commissions. Apart from these commissions being widespread, their recommendations assume a special normative authority within the legislative process. This raises many fundamental questions concerning the nature of moral expertise and how such commissions should deal with the political contexts in which they operate. Through a reading of the relevant discussions in the literature in which the underlying normative ideals are located, this article reconstructs four normative models of the proper role of ethics commissions. This reconstruction seeks to contribute to analytical clarity and to elucidate the underlying disagreements concerning our expectations of ethics commissions. The four models, labeled ‘commission consensus model’, ‘society-proxy model’, ‘correctness model’, and ‘deep pluralism model’, differ from one another in terms of two main dimensions: the expertise and the public/political dimensions. After describing the models, giving examples from the literature on how they can be explicated, and describing an empirical example of a commission that has approximated the ideals, the strengths and weaknesses of the four models are discussed before the article concludes by asking whether there is one correct model of ethics commissions.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 103,314

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Liberalism, authority, and bioethics commissions.D. Robert MacDougall - 2013 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 34 (6):461-477.
Ethics in Trouble: A Philosopher’s Role in Moral Practice and the Expert Model of National Bioethics Commissions.Anne Siegetsleitner - 2011 - Cultural and Ethical Turns: Interdisciplinary Reflections on Culture, Politics and Ethics.
Commissions and biomedical ethics: The canadian experience.John R. Williams - 1989 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 14 (4):425-444.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-07-25

Downloads
27 (#864,536)

6 months
5 (#702,808)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Eilev Hegstad
Høgskolen i Oslo

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references