Intercultural Understanding and The Role of Europe

The Monist 78 (1):5-17 (1995)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The following considerations have their origin in the recent debate on inter-cultural understanding. In one respect one might characterize the opposing positions in this debate as anthropological universalism and anthropological relativism. Each party, however, imputes to the other a hidden Eurocentrism. The intention of my paper is to show that a third way between these opposing positions is possible, a way that becomes evident when one reflects explicitly on the bearing of European culture on this debate.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,369

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-01-09

Downloads
74 (#284,937)

6 months
12 (#307,302)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

Questioning cosmopolitan justice.Tom Campbell - 2010 - In Stan van Hooft & Wim Vandekerckhove (eds.), Questioning Cosmopolitanism. Springer. pp. 121--135.
Questioning the questioning of cosmopolitanism.Nigel Dower - 2010 - In Stan van Hooft & Wim Vandekerckhove (eds.), Questioning Cosmopolitanism. Springer. pp. 3--20.
Do Cosmopolitan Ethics and Cosmopolitan Democracy Imply Each Other?Carol C. Gould - 2010 - In Stan van Hooft & Wim Vandekerckhove (eds.), Questioning Cosmopolitanism. Springer. pp. 153--166.

View all 14 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references