Is the work of art a construct? A reply to professor Pepper

Journal of Philosophy 52 (16):433-439 (1955)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,072

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Professor Donald William versus Hume.Dickinson S. Miller - 1947 - Journal of Philosophy 44 (25):673-684.
Professor Donald Williams on Aristotle.Leonard Linsky - 1954 - Philosophical Review 63 (2):250-252.
Reply to professor Schneider.Edwin E. Aubrey - 1951 - Journal of Philosophy 48 (3):74-77.
Reply to professor Calkins.Ralph Barton Perry - 1927 - Journal of Philosophy 24 (25):683-685.
Reply to professor Lee.Stuart M. Brown - 1951 - Journal of Philosophy 48 (8):244-247.
Reply to professor Hoekstra.Stephen C. Pepper - 1945 - Journal of Philosophy 42 (4):101-108.
Reply to professor Moore.James Bissett Pratt - 1941 - Journal of Philosophy 38 (3):78-80.
Reply to professor Ushenko.Willard V. Quine - 1942 - Journal of Philosophy 39 (3):68-71.
A reply to professor Mandelbaum's note.Richard A. Littman - 1943 - Journal of Philosophy 40 (14):374-377.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
261 (#102,644)

6 months
9 (#489,609)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references