The Impairment Argument Against Abortion

In Nicholas Colgrove, Bruce P. Blackshaw & Daniel Rodger (eds.), Agency, Pregnancy and Persons: Essays in Defense of Human Life. Oxford, UK: Routledge (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

I provide an updated version of The Impairment Argument against abortion and respond to numerous objections that can be (and have been) raised to it.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-05-06

Downloads
2,233 (#5,242)

6 months
510 (#2,488)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Perry Hendricks
Purdue University

Citations of this work

The Pregnancy Rescue Case: why abortion is immoral.Perry Hendricks - 2024 - Journal of Medical Ethics 50 (5):332-334.
Impairing the Impairment Argument.Kyle van Oosterum & Emma J. Curran - 2024 - Journal of Medical Ethics 50 (5):335-339.
Defending the impairment argument.Bruce Philip Blackshaw - 2024 - Journal of Medical Ethics 50 (5):342-344.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Why abortion is immoral.Don Marquis - 1989 - Journal of Philosophy 86 (4):183-202.
A Defense of Abortion.David Boonin - 2002 - Cambridge University Press.
Abortion and Infanticide.Michael Tooley - 1972 - Philosophy 59 (230):545-547.
Fetuses, Newborns, and Parental Responsibility.Prabhpal Singh - 2020 - Journal of Medical Ethics 46 (3):188-193.

View all 13 references / Add more references