Virgil's third Eclogue: how do you keep an idiot in suspense?

Classical Quarterly 48 (01):213- (1998)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Two herdsmen meet and bicker; bargain over a stake; duel in balladeering; and ballot their umpire for a final decision. The first half of their poem dramatizes the process of challenge and defiance from which the bout materializes; the result is a draw. Critics attempt what none of its three herdsmen try out loud, namely to solve the pair of riddles with which the song-contest ends, before the judge pronounces the result. Solutions range between putative attribution to the bucolic minds of the riddlers, and ascription to their creator, the intellectual, urban, bookish, Hellenizing poetaster, who here, in any event, dares a touch of rustic needling that he precisely did not find in his studies in Theocritea, which include no riddles. Solution has generally seemed the self-evident challenge to scholar-readers

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,072

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Riddles in Virgil's Third Eclogue.D. E. W. Wormell - 1960 - Classical Quarterly 10 (1-2):29-.
The Riddles in Martius Valerius.Ruurd Nauta - 2024 - Philologus: Zeitschrift für Antike Literatur Und Ihre Rezeption 168 (2):207-215.
The Oath-Challenge in Athens.David Cyrus Mirhady - 1991 - Classical Quarterly 41 (01):78-.
The Culex’s Metapoetic Funerary Garden.K. Sara Myers - 2020 - Classical Quarterly 70 (2):749-755.
Three Riddles of Induction.David Johnson - 1989 - Dissertation, Princeton University

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-12-09

Downloads
67 (#315,498)

6 months
23 (#132,661)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The Eclogues of Vergil.H. J. Rose - 1944 - Philosophical Review 53 (1):86-88.

Add more references