On the Productivity of the Prefixal Reinforcer Arcy- ‘Arch-’ in Polish: A Diachronic Corpus Perspective

Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric 67 (1):31-44 (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Although typically realized by free items, degree modification has a number of morphological exponents in Polish, including the neoclassical prefix arcy-, which, while originally attaching to profession-denoting nouns with a view to indicating a higher rank in a hierarchy, has come to perform the function of reinforcement in conjunction with adjectival bases. Since the scarce previous research concerned with the aforementioned prefixal reinforcer builds only on lexicographic material, this paper offers a quantitative, corpus-based account of the productivity of the formative at issue by providing its TTR (type-token ratio) and HTR (hapax-token ratio) measures, calculated by dividing the number of, respectively, types of adjectival bases and hapax adjectives by that of all relevant tokens, in two periods in the history of Polish, namely in the Baroque epoch, when arcy- gained a strong foothold in language practice owing to the then prevalent rhetorical tendency toward a profuse employment of elements of foreign provenance, and in contemporary Polish. The results of the empirical analysis indicate a dramatic decrease in the level of the bound form’s productivity over time, to the point that the probability of an arcy-adjective encountered by a language user being unique fell from nearly 30% in the Baroque period to less than 1% at present time, which can be accounted for in terms of the formative having been superseded by more recent, functionally analogous prefixes, particularly super- and mega-.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,010

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

What predicts productivity? Theory meets individuals.Hendrik De Smet - 2020 - Cognitive Linguistics 31 (2):251-278.
Dominant Semantic Properties Of Adjectival Compounds In English.Vladimir Jovanovic - 2007 - Facta Universitatis, Series: Linguistics and Literature 5 (1):19-30.
A few notes on the language of eu antitrust law in English-polish translation.Anna Piszcz - 2013 - Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric 34 (1):161-174.
Logic and the Ontology of Language.Urszula Wybraniec-Skardowska - 2019 - In Bartłomiej Skowron (ed.), Contemporary Polish Ontology. Berlin: De Gruyter. pp. 109-132.
Thinking in a foreign language, fast and slow.Anna Turula - 2016 - Polish Psychological Bulletin 47 (2):228-232.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-12-31

Downloads
15 (#1,234,199)

6 months
6 (#861,180)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Adjectives and boundedness.Carita Paradis - 2001 - Cognitive Linguistics 12 (1).
Degree Words.Dwight Bolinger - 1976 - Foundations of Language 14 (3):377-398.

Add more references