Duhem, Quine and a New Empiricism

Royal Institute of Philosophy Lectures 3:191-209 (1969)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

As in the case of great books in all branches of philosophy, Pierre Duhem's Le Théorie Physique , first published in 1906, can be looked to as the progenitor of many different and even conflicting currents in subsequent philosophy of science. On a superficial reading, it seems to be an expression of what later came to be called deductivist and instrumentalist analyses of scientific theory. Duhem's very definition of physical theory, put forward early in the book, is the quintessence of instrumentalism: A physical theory is not an explanation. It is a system of mathematical propositions, deduced from a small number of principles, which aim to represent as simply, as completely, and as exactly as possible a set of experimental laws [p. 19]

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,619

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Duhem-Quine Thesis Reconsidered.Piotr K. Szałek - 2020 - Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric 62 (1):73-93.
Pierre Duhem and the inconsistency between instrumentalism and natural classification.Sonia Maria Dion - 2013 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 44 (1):12-19.
Challenges to empiricism.Harold Morick (ed.) - 1972 - Belmont, Calif.,: Wadsworth Pub. Co..
The New French Edition of Pierre Duhem’s The Aim and Structure of the Physical Theory.Stoffel Jean-François - 2017 - Transversal: International Journal for the Historiography of Science 2:160-162.
Discussion: In defense of Duhem.Francis Seaman - 1965 - Philosophy of Science 32 (3/4):287.
In defense of Duhem.Francis Seaman - 1965 - Philosophy of Science 32 (3/4):287-294.
Sense and Reference of a Believer.Meghan D. Page - 2018 - American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 92 (1):145-157.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-12-23

Downloads
105 (#199,935)

6 months
15 (#193,843)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Theories and the transitivity of confirmation.Mary Hesse - 1970 - Philosophy of Science 37 (1):50-63.
On the origin and significance of Poincaré's conventionalism.Jerzy Giedymin - 1977 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 8 (4):271-301.
Why is 'incommensurability' a problem?Nancy J. Nersessian - 1982 - Acta Biotheoretica 31 (4):205-218.
Justifying Feminist Social Science.Linda Alcoff - 1987 - Hypatia 2 (3):107 - 127.
Poincaré's Conventionalism of Applied Geometry.F. P. O'Gorman - 1977 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 8 (4):303.

View all 7 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

Word and Object.Willard Van Orman Quine - 1960 - Les Etudes Philosophiques 17 (2):278-279.
The Logic of Scientific Discovery.Karl Popper - 1959 - Studia Logica 9:262-265.
Conjectures and Refutations.K. Popper - 1963 - Les Etudes Philosophiques 21 (3):431-434.
Conjectures and Refutations.Karl Popper - 1963 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 19 (2):159-168.
Patterns of Discovery.Norwood R. Hanson, A. D. Ritchie & Henryk Mehlberg - 1960 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 10 (40):346-349.

View all 13 references / Add more references