Argument against Ethicists' Testimony Logically Flawed

Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 28 (4_suppl):4-5 (2001)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,497

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Argument against Ethicists' Testimony Logically Flawed.T. Patrick Hill - 2001 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 28 (4_suppl):4-5.
Argument against Ethicists' Testimony Logically Flawed.T. Patrick Hill - 2001 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 28 (s4):4-5.
Two Courts Rule against Admissibility of Testimony.Giles R. Scofield - 2001 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 28 (4_suppl):5-5.
Two Courts Rule Against Admissibility of Testimony.Giles R. Scofield - 2001 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 28 (s4):5-5.
Two Courts Rule against Admissibility of Testimony.Giles R. Scofield - 2001 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 28 (4_suppl):5-5.
Ethics Expert Testimony: Against the Skeptics.G. J. Agich & B. J. Spielman - 1997 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 22 (4):381-403.
Rebuttal: Expert Ethics Testimony.Françoise Baylis - 2000 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 28 (3):240-242.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-31

Downloads
44 (#498,365)

6 months
7 (#671,981)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references