James B. Freeman, Acceptable Premises [Book Review]

Philosophical Inquiry 29 (1-2):168-175 (2007)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

ISBN(s)

1105235X

DOI

10.5840/philinquiry2007291/213

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,937

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Review of James B. Freeman, Acceptable Premises: An Epistemic Approach to an Informal Logic Problem. [REVIEW]Hans V. Hansen - 2005 - Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2005 (10).
David Hume.Paul G. Kuntz - 1983 - Philosophical Inquiry 5 (4):168-173.
David Hume.Daniela Fatzer - 1997 - Philosophical Inquiry 19 (1-2):1-17.
Book Review. [REVIEW][author unknown] - 2006 - History and Philosophy of Logic 27 (2):209-210.
David Hume.Paul G. Kuntz - 1983 - Philosophical Inquiry 5 (4):168-173.
David Hume.L. Bargeliotes - 2000 - Philosophical Inquiry 22 (3):83-102.
Differences Between A- and B-Time.Barbara V. Nunn - 2000 - Philosophical Inquiry 22 (1-2):103-114.
David Hitchcock, On Reasoning and Argument. Essays in Informal Logic and on Critical Thinking. [REVIEW]Gabriela Bašić Hanžek - 2020 - Croatian Journal of Philosophy 20 (2):257-261.
Ancient Greek Philosophy. [REVIEW]Anastasia Marinopoulou - 2008 - Philosophical Inquiry 30 (3-4):202-204.
Exchanging Reasons: responses to critics.Lilian Bermejo-Luque - 2011 - Theoria 26 (3):329-343.

Analytics

Added to PP
2012-09-18

Downloads
18 (#1,112,360)

6 months
5 (#1,039,842)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references