The ethics of compulsory removal under section 47 of the 1948 National Assistance Act

Journal of Medical Ethics 24 (1):38-43 (1998)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Orders for removal under Section 47 of the 1948 National Assistance Act are little discussed. However, they involve severe infringements of the civil liberties of those affected. It is argued that all previously presented justifications for the use of these orders fail. Repeal of the act is called for. The Law Commission has drafted alternative legislation, but this has not been enacted. Until this occurs local authorities, the Faculty of Public Health Medicine and individual public health physicians should refuse to be involved in its use

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,297

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-09-13

Downloads
81 (#259,970)

6 months
1 (#1,890,996)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Paternalism.Gerald Dworkin - 1972 - The Monist 56 (1):64-84.
Section 47.J. A. Gray - 1981 - Journal of Medical Ethics 7 (3):146-149.

Add more references