Proportionality and Divine Naming: Did St. Thomas Change His Mind about Analogy?

The Thomist 77 (4):531-558 (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The common view that Aquinas changed his mind about analogy (before and after De Veritate 2.11) is unwarranted. Dialectical context, and clarifications about the logic of analogy and the implications of proportionality, reveal consistency in Aquinas's teaching on the analogy of divine names.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Rest of Cajetan’s Analogy Theory.Joshua P. Hochschild - 2005 - International Philosophical Quarterly 45 (3):341-356.
Cajetan on Scotus on Univocity.Joshua Hochschild - 2007 - Proceedings of the Society for Medieval Logic and Metaphysics 7:32-42.
The Twofold Character of Thomas Aquinas’s Analogy of Being.Victor Salas - 2009 - International Philosophical Quarterly 49 (3):295-315.
A Trace of Similarity within Even Greater Dissimilarity.Mariusz Tabaczek - 1970 - Forum Philosophicum: International Journal for Philosophy 23 (1):95-132.
The Semantics of Analogy: Rereading Cajetan's De Nominum Analogia.Joshua P. Hochschild - 2010 - Notre Dame, IN, USA: University of Notre Dame Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-12-20

Downloads
747 (#33,043)

6 months
101 (#60,154)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Joshua P. Hochschild
Mount St. Mary's University

Citations of this work

Medieval theories of analogy.E. Jennifer Ashworth - 2012 - In Ed Zalta (ed.), Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Stanford, CA: Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. pp. 22.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references