Parfit’s Mixed Maxim Objection against the Formula of Universal Law Reconsidered

Journal of Value Inquiry 58 (1):13-32 (2024)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,063

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The concept of value.Kurt Baier - 1967 - Journal of Value Inquiry 1 (1):1-11.
Referees.[author unknown] - 2011 - Journal of Value Inquiry 45 (4):509-513.
News.[author unknown] - 2008 - Journal of Value Inquiry 42 (2):275-285.
News.[author unknown] - 2004 - Journal of Value Inquiry 38 (4):589-597.
Referees.[author unknown] - 2010 - Journal of Value Inquiry 44 (4):593-595.
News.[author unknown] - 2007 - Journal of Value Inquiry 41 (1):137-146.
News.[author unknown] - 2009 - Journal of Value Inquiry 43 (1):133-147.
Referees.[author unknown] - 2000 - Journal of Value Inquiry 34 (4):597-597.

Analytics

Added to PP
2021-10-30

Downloads
36 (#618,808)

6 months
10 (#379,980)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Martin Sticker
University of Bristol

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

Why We Should Reject S.Derek Parfit - 1984 - In Reasons and Persons. Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press.
The Practice of Moral Judgment.Barbara Herman - 1985 - Journal of Philosophy 82 (8):414.
Kant's Universal Law Formula Revisited.Sven Nyholm - 2015 - Metaphilosophy 46 (2):280-299.
Thinking about Cases: Applying Kant's Universal Law Formula.Jochen Bojanowski - 2017 - European Journal of Philosophy 26 (4):1253-1268.
Do We Always Act on Maxims?Sven Nyholm - 2017 - Kantian Review 22 (2):233-255.

View all 10 references / Add more references