Harm, Truth, and the Nocebo Effect

Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 29 (2):236-245 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Nocebo effects occur when an individual experiences undesirable physiological reactions caused by doxastic states that are not a treatment’s core or characteristic features.1 As Scott Gelfand2 points out, there are numerous studies that have shown that the disclosure of a treatment’s side effects to a patient increases the risk of the side effects. From an ethical point of view, nocebo effects caused by the disclosures of side effects present a challenging problem. On the one hand, clinicians’ duty to inform patients of the consequences (including possible side effects) of their treatments is critical in ensuring that patients’ autonomy is respected. Patients cannot act autonomously if relevant information is withheld from them (without their consent, perhaps). On the other hand, clinicians also ought to minimize harm to patients.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,809

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-04-13

Downloads
19 (#1,072,200)

6 months
11 (#338,628)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Dien Ho
Massachusetts College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations