- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Do Not Forget the Right to Withdraw!
American Journal of Bioethics 17 (12):14-15 (2017)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Other Versions
No versions found
Links
PhilArchive
External links
(no proxy)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Through your library
- Sign in / register and customize your OpenURL resolver
- Configure custom resolver
My notes
Similar books and articles
The case against meta-consent: not only do Ploug and Holm not answer it, they make it even stronger.Neil C. Manson - 2020 - Journal of Medical Ethics 46 (9):627-628.
The biobank consent debate: Why ‘meta-consent’ is not the solution?Neil C. Manson - 2019 - Journal of Medical Ethics 45 (5):291-294.
The ethics of biobanking: Assessing the right to control problem for broad consent.Neil C. Manson - 2019 - Bioethics 33 (5):540-549.
Holm, Søren: Religionsphilosophie. [REVIEW]Franz Wiedmann - 1961 - Philosophisches Jahrbuch 69 (1):185.
Thinking Ahead: Bioethics and the Future, the Future of Bioethics. Challenges, Changes, Concepts: 11th IAB World Congress of Bioethics, Rotterdam, 26.–29. Juni 2012, organisiert von: Inez de Beaufort , Angus Dawson, Hans van Delden, Søren Holm, Maartje Schermer und Marcel Verweij. [REVIEW]Jan-Ole Reichardt & Markus Rüther - 2013 - Ethik in der Medizin 25 (1):79-81.
Framing the "Right to Withdraw" in the Use of Biospecimens for iPSC Research.Justin Lowenthal & Sara Chandros Hull - 2013 - Ethics in Biology, Engineering and Medicine 4 (1):1-14.
Circumcision registry promotes precise research and fosters informed parental decisions.Robert S. Van Howe, Morten Frisch, Peter W. Adler & J. Steven Svoboda - 2019 - BMC Medical Ethics 20 (1):6.
Reevaluating the Right to Withdraw From Research Without Penalty.G. Owen Schaefer & Alan Wertheimer - 2011 - American Journal of Bioethics 11 (4):14-16.
Analytics
Added to PP
2017-11-18
Downloads
43 (#516,917)
6 months
10 (#399,629)
2017-11-18
Downloads
43 (#516,917)
6 months
10 (#399,629)
Historical graph of downloads
References found in this work
Reframing Consent for Clinical Research: A Function-Based Approach.Scott Y. H. Kim, David Wendler, Kevin P. Weinfurt, Robert Silbergleit, Rebecca D. Pentz, Franklin G. Miller, Bernard Lo, Steven Joffe, Christine Grady, Sara F. Goldkind, Nir Eyal & Neal W. Dickert - 2017 - American Journal of Bioethics 17 (12):3-11.
Meta Consent – A Flexible Solution to the Problem of Secondary Use of Health Data.Thomas Ploug & Søren Holm - 2016 - Bioethics 30 (9):721-732.
Informed consent and registry-based research - the case of the Danish circumcision registry.Thomas Ploug & Søren Holm - 2017 - BMC Medical Ethics 18 (1):53.
Withdrawing from Research: A Rethink in the Context of Research Biobanks. [REVIEW]Søren Holm - 2011 - Health Care Analysis 19 (3):269-281.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-667477cd97-sfdq8 dc2