Humankind

Canadian Journal of Philosophy, Supplementary Volume 20 (sup1):69-105 (1994)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Just as the differentiation of human beings from other species has traditionally been thought to be based on some common essence or nature, so has the division of humankind into certain groups, in particular, men and women and races, been thought to be based on their distinct natures. There are many similarities between the concepts of human nature, ‘women’s nature’ and race, and how these concepts have functioned ideologically: For all three, the traditional idea was that there were fixed, natural essences determining the cognitive, moral, and emotional traits and abilities of the group in question. Some, e.g., Plato, and Herrnstein in recent years, have applied the idea to different social classes as well. I will call this view essentialism, and note that it is compatible with various metaphysical analyses. One could be opposed to metaphysical essentialism, but accept essences in this sense, as, for example, Hume did.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,937

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

An Outline of the Origin of Humankind.Li Zehou - 1999 - Contemporary Chinese Thought 31 (2):20-25.
Humankind, Animals and Misanthropy.David E. Cooper - 2021 - Journal of Philosophical Research 46:59-71.
Humankind: a brief history.Felipe Fernández-Armesto - 2004 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Legalism and Humankind.Frank I. Michelman - 1992 - Social Philosophy and Policy 9 (2):190-208.
Humankind and the Rape of the World.Charles W. Harvey - 2016 - Philosophy in the Contemporary World 23 (2):93-102.
Humankind, Human Nature, and Misanthropy.Ian James Kidd - 2020 - Metascience 29 (3):505-508.
Humankind and Nature in Indian Philosophy.John M. Koller - 1991 - In Eliot Deutsch & Ronald Bontekoe (eds.), A Companion to World Philosophies. Malden, Mass.: Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 279–289.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-04-03

Downloads
48 (#458,202)

6 months
7 (#706,906)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Nancy Holmstrom
Rutgers University - Newark

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The Theory of Need in Marx.Agnes Heller - 1976 - Science and Society 43 (3):349-355.
The justice position and the care perspective.Eva F. Kittay & Diana T. Meyers - 1987 - In Diana T. Meyers (ed.), Women and Moral Theory. Totowa, N.J.: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers. pp. 4--10.

View all 12 references / Add more references