Art and Real Life

Philosophy 55 (212):183 - 192 (1980)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In 1954 F. R. Leavis wrote to the Times Literary Supplement taking issue with one of its reviewers. The reviewer had contrasted Leavis's approach to Shakespeare with that of Empson and Bradley. The latter, the reviewer had said, ‘like the plain man, or the audience in a theatre, cannot help considering the situation [in one of Shakespeare's plays] as “actual” and the characters as “real”’. Leavis, the reviewer had implied, treats the situation and characters somewhat differently.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,297

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Hanfling and Radford on Art and Real Life.H. O. Mounce - 1985 - Philosophy 60 (231):127 - 128.
On the determination of values: The case of F. R. Leavis.Kevin Harris - 1993 - Journal of Philosophy of Education 27 (2):245–259.
Leavis, literary criticism and philosophy.Peter Byrne - 1979 - British Journal of Aesthetics 19 (3):263-273.
Leavis on Tragedy.Paul Dean - 2016 - Philosophy and Literature 40 (1):189-205.
F. R. Leavis (review). [REVIEW]David Novitz - 1995 - Philosophy and Literature 19 (2):360-361.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-10

Downloads
116 (#186,258)

6 months
29 (#119,388)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

How Can We Be Moved by the Fate of Anna Karenina.Colin Radford & Michael Weston - 1975 - Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 49 (1):67 - 93.

Add more references