Graham Nerlich: The Shape of Space

Dialogue 20 (4):783-798 (1981)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Space is a particular, the particular thing structuring our world. It has shape. And size. And reference to space and its properties is fundamental to physical explanation. This, in a nutshell, is Nerlich's position. Espousing it Nerlich marches against the tide of philosophical opinion which dominated the first half or more of this century.His arguments are laid out in a wholly enjoyable book: clearly and simply written, ‘meaty’ in argument and lucid in explanation. The book does not have the same technical scope in theoretical physics as do its relevant companions. Rather, the book is a sustained argument aimed at establishing the theses with which I began and its content has been selected accordingly. But the clarity of presentation and consistency of argument recommend it as a major contribution to the field. It is especially to be recommended to the non-technical philosopher. And there is another important reason for commending it: much of the argumentation of the book is not to be found elsewhere, it fills an important gap in the field. I need hardly add that I find myself in sympathy with Nerlich's position.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,369

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Review of Graham Nerlich: The Shape of Space[REVIEW]J. R. Lucas - 1978 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 29 (3):299-301.
The Shape of Space.Graham Nerlich - 1994 - Cambridge University Press.
What Spacetime Explains. [REVIEW]Alexander Rueger - 1996 - Review of Metaphysics 49 (3):670-671.
A Presentation and Defense of Anton Marty’s Conception of Space.Ingvar Johansson - 2019 - In Giuliano Bacigalupo & Hélène Leblanc (eds.), Anton Marty and Contemporary Philosophy. Cham: Palgrave. pp. 99-119.
Kant's hands and Earman's pions: Chirality arguments for substantival space.Carl Hoefer - 2000 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 14 (3):237 – 256.
On field's argument for substantivalism.Jerzy Gołosz - 1999 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 13 (1):5 – 16.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-09-25

Downloads
65 (#327,911)

6 months
8 (#605,434)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations