Rorty and Postmodern Environmental Ethics

Environmental Ethics 20 (2):183-193 (1998)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Richard Rorty’s pragmatic abandonment of epistemological representationalism has important implications for environmental ethics, particularly postmodern environmental ethics. I discuss Rorty’s position and show that Mark Sagoff’s version of it allows for both rational negotiation of public environmental issues and for the creation of solidarity among people regarding the environment. I then discuss Eugene Hargrove’s view that representation, rather than being implicated in the destruction of nature, is a key element in preserving (the intrinsic value of) nature. I conclude that Hargrove’s position is compatible with Rorty’s and Sagoff’s positions and I argue that aesthetic representation may still be needed in a postmodern world that has abandoned epistemological representationalism.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,369

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Has the history of philosophy ruined the environment?Robin Attfield - 1991 - Environmental Ethics 13 (2):127-137.
Searching for Intrinsic Value.Eric Katz - 1987 - Environmental Ethics 9 (3):231-241.
Captives or Conquerors: Debates of Overcoming Representationalism.Kundu Vijayan Prasanna - 2015 - Journal of the Indian Council of Philosophical Research 32 (3):391-403.
The Paradox of Environmental Ethics.Martin Drenthen - 1999 - Environmental Ethics 21 (2):163-175.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
85 (#248,012)

6 months
14 (#237,383)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references