Conceptual differences amongst the data collection instruments used in clinical audit

Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 2 (2):153-156 (1996)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 103,343

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Acquisition and use of clinical data for audit and research.Jeremy Wyatt Dm Mrcp - 1995 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 1 (1):15-27.
Evaluation in clinical practice: problems, precedents and principles.Neil Mclntyre - 1995 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 1 (1):5-13.
Acquisition and use of clinical data for audit and research.J. Wyatt - 1995 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 1 (1):15-27.
Clinical audit and quality improvement–time for a rethink?Paul Bowie, Nicholas A. Bradley & Rosemary Rushmer - 2012 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 18 (1):42-48.
Improving general practitioner records in France by a two‐round medical audit.Jean Brami & Michel Doumenc - 2002 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 8 (2):175-181.
Clinical audit: Audit in british general practice: Domination or disillusionment?John D. Holden - 1999 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 5 (3):313-322.
Measuring the quality of clinical audit projects.Andrew D. Millard - 2000 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 6 (4):359-370.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-24

Downloads
18 (#1,157,809)

6 months
3 (#1,061,821)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references