‘Not birth, marriage or death, but gastrulation’: the life of a quotation in biology

British Journal for the History of Science 55 (1):1-26 (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This history of a statement attributed to the developmental biologist Lewis Wolpert exemplifies the making and uses of quotations in recent science. Wolpert's dictum, ‘It is not birth, marriage or death, but gastrulation which is truly the most important time in your life’, was produced in a series of international shifts of medium and scale. It originated in his vivid declaration in conversation with a non-specialist at a workshop dinner, gained its canonical form in a colleague's monograph, and was amplified as a quotation on a poster derived from an undergraduate project. Although it drew on Wolpert's authority and he accepted his authorship, it thus represents a collective sifting of earlier claims for the significance of prenatal existence through the values of 1980s developmental biology. Juxtaposing a technical term with major life events has let teachers engage students, and researchers entice journalists, while sharing an in-joke that came to mark community identity. Serious applications include arguing for an extension of the fourteen-day limit on human-embryo research. On this evidence, quotations have been kept busy addressing every audience of specialized knowledge.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,423

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-04-08

Downloads
35 (#652,794)

6 months
5 (#1,067,832)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Nick Hopwood
Cambridge University

References found in this work

The Rhetoric of History.J. H. Hexter - 1967 - History and Theory 6 (1):3-13.
Images of science in the classroom: wallcharts and science education 1850–1920.Massimiano Bucchi - 1998 - British Journal for the History of Science 31 (2):161-184.

Add more references