Psychoanalysis, Philosophical Issues

In SAGE Reference project Encyclopedia of Philosophy and the Social Sciences. Sage Publications (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper briefly addresses questions of confirmation and disconfirmation in psychoanalysis. It argues that psychoanalysis enjoys Bayesian support as an interpretive extension of commonsense psychology that provides the best explanation of a large range of empirical data. Suggestion provides no such explanation, and recent work in attachment, developmental psychology, and neuroscience accord with this view.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Epistemology and Depth Psychology.Jim Hopkins - 1988 - In Peter A. Clark & Crispin Wright (eds.), Mind, Psychoanalysis, and Science. Blackwell.
Inferring Motives in Psychology and Psychoanalysis.Michael Lacewing - 2012 - Philosophy, Psychiatry, and Psychology 19 (3):197-212.
On Caution and Courage in Psychoanalytic Epistemology.Peter Fonagy - 2012 - Philosophy, Psychiatry, and Psychology 19 (3):213-215.
Metapsychology and the suggestion argument: a reply to Grünbaum's critique of psychoanalysis.Ari Ollinheimo - 1999 - [Helsinki]: Finnish Academy of Science and Letters. Edited by Risto Vuorinen.
The unconscious in social explanation.Mark Bevir - 2004 - Philosophical Psychology 17 (2):181-207.
Psychological Explanation: Tacit Theory or Simulation?Angela Joan Arkway - 1995 - Dissertation, City University of New York

Analytics

Added to PP
2012-10-08

Downloads
1,726 (#8,334)

6 months
126 (#42,688)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Jim Hopkins
University College London

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references