Mathematical Pythagoreanism and Plato’s Cratylus

In Plato and Pythagoreanism. Oxford University Press USA (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This chapter traces Plato's philosophical responses to the puzzle of Epicharmus' “Growing Argument” in the earlier and middle dialogues of Plato, especially Euthyphro and Cratylus. Plato's approach to this problem is rooted in his metaphysical propositions, including the correlative assumptions of participation of sensibles in Forms and imitation as a vehicle for names to obtain the properties of their governing Forms. By attacking a Sophistical version of the “Growing Argument” given by Cratylus, Plato simultaneously appropriates certain principles of ontological predication given by Philolaus of Croton, thus pitting, in effect, the ideas of one mathematical Pythagorean against those of another.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 103,401

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Plato and Pythagoreanism.Phillip Sidney Horky - 2013 - Oxford University Press USA.
What Is Wisest?Phillip Sidney Horky - 2013 - In Plato and Pythagoreanism. Oxford University Press USA.
Reappraising Plato’s Cratylus.David Meißner - 2024 - Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 106 (1):1-22.
True and False Speech in Plato's "Cratylus" 385 B-C.W. M. Pfeiffer - 1972 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 2 (1):87 - 104.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-10-24

Downloads
22 (#1,015,764)

6 months
19 (#140,303)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Phillip Sidney Horky
Durham University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references