The origins of modern cross-cultural European interpretations of Chinese philosophy. New thoughts on China in the work of G. W. Leibniz [Book Review]

Human Affairs 30 (2):146-163 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Leibniz was not the one to discover China, as far as Western culture was concerned. His historical contribution lies in the fact he presented Europe and China as two distinct ways of contemplating the world, as fully comparable and resulting in types of societies at the same high institutional, economic, technological, political and moral level. In this sense he saw China as the “Europe of the Orient” and as such susceptible to investigation by the same tools of natural philosophy which Leibniz knew from the environs of European scholarship. He was the first representative of the classical school of European philosophy to knowingly reject Eurocentrism. Leibniz followed the intentions of learned missionaries in his understanding of the Christian mission as a cultural and civilisational task, a search for mutual agreement and connections, in favour of a reciprocal understanding.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,937

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Trading With Light.Wenchao Li - 2015 - Journal of Philosophical Research 40 (Supplement):425-437.
Discovering China: European interpretations in the Enlightenment.Julia Ching & Willard Gurdon Oxtoby (eds.) - 1992 - Rochester, N.Y., USA: University of Rochester Press.
Writings on China.Eric Sotnak - 1995 - The Leibniz Review 5:33-35.
Leibniz and China: A Commerce of Light (review). [REVIEW]Robin Wang - 2007 - Philosophy East and West 57 (1):111-114.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-04-18

Downloads
24 (#909,478)

6 months
9 (#485,111)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?