The politics we live by: Leveson and women

Abstract

If ‘Leveson and Women’ were a headline in a tabloid newspaper, a salacious story would probably follow. ‘Leveson and Women’ is my title, but I have nothing salacious to say, although I shall talk about the scandalous behaviour of the British press. I gave evidence to the Leveson Inquiry into the culture, practice and ethics of the press. I write here about how I came to do so, about how the inquiry came into being, and about the controversy that the inquiry and its report continue to provoke.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,516

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

Apologies made at the Leveson Inquiry.James Murphy - 2016 - Pragmatics and Society 7 (4):595-617.
Press Self-Regulation in Britain: A Critique.Raphael Cohen-Almagor - 2015 - Science and Engineering Ethics 21 (1):159-181.
The Importance of Being Ernst.R. Glanville - 2007 - Constructivist Foundations 2 (2-3):5-6.
Reply to Richard Berrong.Wayne C. Booth - 1985 - Critical Inquiry 11 (4):697-701.
I-ing Film.Norman N. Holland - 1986 - Critical Inquiry 12 (4):654-671.
Standing Up.Emily Quinn - 2015 - Narrative Inquiry in Bioethics 5 (2):109-111.
Response to Mary Rowell.F. Baylis - 2004 - Journal of Medical Ethics 30 (1):51-52.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-11-11

Downloads
32 (#699,889)

6 months
7 (#684,641)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Jennifer Hornsby
Birkbeck, University of London

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references