What’s wrong with ‘compassion’? Towards a political, philosophical and theological context

Clinical Ethics 8 (4):91-97 (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In some popular and political discourse, ‘compassion’ is commonly conceived as a simple or ‘given’ aspect of the world. And yet public discussion also focusses on whether ‘compassion' has gone wrong in some way, suggesting that there might be various more or less satisfactory versions of compassion. At the same time, some thinkers doubt whether compassion should any longer be expected of those working in healthcare. This article draws on philosophical and theological resources to argue that the conceptual context which forms compassion is crucial for determining the ethos of healthcare. The discussion explores three themes – politics, suffering and responsibility – which must be addressed in order to understand what is wrong with compassion, to identify lines of future investigation and to develop possible remedies

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 103,401

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-23

Downloads
54 (#418,521)

6 months
9 (#328,796)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Discussion: The physical basis of emotion.William James - 1894 - Psychological Review 1 (5):516-529.
Compassion and Beyond.Roger Crisp - 2008 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 11 (3):233-246.
Measuring nursing care and compassion: the McDonaldised nurse?A. Bradshaw - 2009 - Journal of Medical Ethics 35 (8):465-468.

View all 9 references / Add more references