Effects of changing practitioner empathy and patient expectations in healthcare consultations

, , , , , , &
Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 11:Art. No.: CD011934. (2015)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This is a protocol for a Cochrane Review (Intervention). The objectives are as follows: The main aim of this review will be to assess the effects of changing practitioner empathy or patient expectations for all conditions. The main objective is to conduct a systematic review of randomised trials where the intervention involves manipulating either (a) practitioner empathy or (b) patient expectations, or (c) both.

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1002/14651858.cd011934

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

A preliminary investigation of patient and carer expectations of their general practitioner in longer‐term stroke care.Sean Brotheridge, John Young, George Dowswell, John Lawler & Anne Forster - 1998 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 4 (3):237-241.
Making space for empathy: supporting doctors in the emotional labour of clinical care.Angeliki Kerasidou & Ruth Horn - forthcoming - Most Recent Articles: Bmc Medical Ethics.
Empathy in patient care: from ‘Clinical Empathy’ to ‘Empathic Concern’.Clarissa Guidi & Chiara Traversa - 2021 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 24 (4):573-585.
Parachute use to prevent death and major trauma related to gravitational challenge: Systematic review of randomised controlled trials.Gordon C. S. Smith & Jill P. Pell - 2003 - Bmj 327 (7429):1459--61.
Cells and the (imaginary) patient: the multistable practitioner–technology–cell interface in the cytology laboratory. [REVIEW]Anette Forss - 2012 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 15 (3):295-308.
Spin in the reporting, interpretation, and extrapolation of adverse effects of orthodontic interventions: protocol for a cross-sectional study of systematic reviews.Reint A. Meursinge Reynders, Nicola Di Girolamo & Pauline A. J. Steegmans - 2019 - Research Integrity and Peer Review 4 (1).
Pharmacists and health information technology: Emerging issues in patient safety. [REVIEW]Kevin T. Fuji & Kimberly A. Galt - 2008 - HEC Forum 20 (3):259-275.
Patient expectations in placebo‐controlled randomized clinical trials.David A. Stone, Catherine E. Kerr, Eric Jacobson, Lisa A. Conboy ScD & Ted J. Kaptchuk - 2005 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 11 (1):77-84.
Making Health Care Decisions: A Report on the Ethical and Legal Implications of Informed Consent in the Patient—Practitioner Relationship.United States - 1982 - President's Commission for the Study of Ethical Problems in Medicine and Biomedical and Behavioral Research for Sale by the Supt. Of Docs., U.S. G.P.O.
Empathizing with patients: the role of interaction and narratives in providing better patient care.Carter Hardy - 2017 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 20 (2):237-248.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-12-11

Downloads
466 (#60,742)

6 months
103 (#59,168)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references