- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Response to Carlson and Qizilbash
Utilitas 11 (1):106-111 (1999)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Author's Profile
Other Versions
No versions found
My notes
Similar books and articles
The Rejection of Objective Consequentialism: A Comment: Mozaffar Qizilbash.Mozaffar Qizilbash - 1999 - Utilitas 11 (1):97-105.
On the Puzzle of Petitionary Prayer: Response to Daniel and Frances Howard-Snyder.Scott A. Davison - 2011 - European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 3 (1):227 - 237.
What is Consequentialism? A Reply to Howard-Snyder.Walter Sinnott-Armstrong - 2001 - Utilitas 13 (3):342.
Response to Howard-Snyder.J. L. Schellenberg - 1996 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 26 (3):455 - 462.
Trinity Monotheism Once More: A Response to Daniel Howard-Snyder.William Lane Craig - 2006 - Philosophia Christi 8 (1):101 - 113.
In defense of 'the free will defense' response to Daniel Howard-Snyder and John O'Leary-Hawthorne.William L. Rowe - 1998 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 44 (2):115 - 120.
Analytics
Added to PP
2009-06-20
Downloads
144 (#160,180)
6 months
12 (#218,371)
2009-06-20
Downloads
144 (#160,180)
6 months
12 (#218,371)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
Opting for the Best: Oughts and Options.Douglas W. Portmore - 2019 - New York, NY, USA: Oxford University Press.
Actual–Consequence Act Utilitarianism and the Best Possible Humans.Dale E. Miller - 2003 - Ratio 16 (1):49–62.
Objective consequentialism, right actions, and good people.Eric Moore - 2007 - Philosophical Studies 133 (1):83 - 94.
Is Objective Consequentialism Compatible with the Principle that “Ought” Implies “Can”?Vuko Andrić - 2016 - Philosophia 44 (1):63-77.
The Ineffable and the Incalculable: G. E. Moore on Ethical Expertise.Ben Eggleston - 2005 - In Lisa Rasmussen, Ethics Expertise: History, Contemporary Perspectives, and Applications. Springer. pp. 89–102.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-8567d8d854-7fk9p dc2