- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Reply to Rowe
In Michael L. Peterson, Contemporary Debates in Philosophy of Religion. Hoboken: Blackwell (2003)
Abstract
Preprinted in God and the Problem of Evil (Blackwell 2001), ed. William Rowe. In this article, we reply to Bill Rowe's "Evil is Evidence Against Theistic Belief" in Contemporary Debates in Philosophy of Religion (Blackwell 2003).Author Profiles
Michael Bergmann
Purdue University
Daniel Howard-Snyder
Western Washington University
Other Versions
No versions found
Links
PhilArchive
External links
(no proxy)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Through your library
- Sign in / register and customize your OpenURL resolver
- Configure custom resolver
My notes
Similar books and articles
Reply to Rowe.Thomas C. Brickhouse & Nicholas D. Smith - 2012 - The Journal of Ethics 16 (3):325-338.
Transworld sanctity and Plantinga's free will defense.Daniel Howard-Snyder & John Hawthorne - 1998 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 44 (1):1-21.
The Ontological Argument Revisited: A Reply to Rowe.Eric Wilson - 2010 - Forum Philosophicum: International Journal for Philosophy 15 (1):37 - 44.
On Rowe's Argument from Particular Horrors.Daniel Howard-Snyder - 2005 - In Kelly Clark, Readings in Philosophy of Religion. Broadview.
How a pure risk of harm can itself be a harm: A reply to Rowe.H. Orri Stefánsson - 2024 - Analysis 84 (1):112-116.
Grounds for belief in God aside, does evil make atheism more reasonable than theism?Daniel Howard-Snyder & Michael Bergmann - 2003 - In Michael L. Peterson, Contemporary Debates in Philosophy of Religion. Hoboken: Blackwell. pp. 140--55.
Rowe's evidential arguments from evil.Graham Oppy - 2013 - In Justin P. Mcbrayer, A Companion to the Problem of Evil. Wiley. pp. 49-66.
God, evil, and suffering.Daniel Howard-Snyder - 1999 - In Michael J. Murray, Reason for the Hope Within. Eerdmans. pp. 217--237.
Analytics
Added to PP
2009-01-28
Downloads
755 (#35,392)
6 months
71 (#88,167)
2009-01-28
Downloads
755 (#35,392)
6 months
71 (#88,167)
Historical graph of downloads
Author Profiles
Michael Bergmann
Purdue University
Daniel Howard-Snyder
Western Washington University
Citations of this work
If We Can’t Tell What Theism Predicts, We Can’t Tell Whether God Exists: Skeptical Theism and Bayesian Arguments from Evil.Nevin Climenhaga - forthcoming - Oxford Studies in Philosophy of Religion.
A debate between a theist and a santa clausist.Ruth Tallman & David Kyle Johnson - 2015 - Think 14 (40):27-41.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-8567d8d854-zpjm8 dc2