Kuhn's conception of incommensurability

Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 21 (3):481-492 (1990)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,369

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

A Curious Disagreement: response to Hoyningen-Huene and Oberheim.Howard Sankey - 2009 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 40 (2):210-212.
Interview with Paul Hoyningen-Huene.Howard Sankey - 1996 - Metascience 5 (2):59-70.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-09-02

Downloads
194 (#127,700)

6 months
10 (#423,770)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Paul Hoyningen-Huene
Universität Hannover

Citations of this work

Kuhn's changing concept of incommensurability.Howard Sankey - 1993 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 44 (4):759-774.
Philosophy of Developmental Biology.Marcel Weber - 2022 - Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
On incommensurability.Paul Hoyningen-Huene, Eric Oberheim & Hanne Andersen - 1996 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 27 (1):131-141.

View all 32 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

The Essential Tension.Thomas S. Kuhn - 1978 - Philosophy of Science 45 (4):649-652.
Logic of Discovery or Psychology of Research?T. S. Kuhn - 1970 - In Imre Lakatos & Alan Musgrave (eds.), Criticism and the growth of knowledge. Cambridge [Eng.]: Cambridge University Press. pp. 22.
Commensurability, Comparability, Communicability.Thomas S. Kuhn - 1982 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1982:669 - 688.
What Are Scientific Revolutions?Thomas S. Kuhn - 1981 - Center for Cognitive Science, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

View all 8 references / Add more references