Moral Considerability and Decision-Making

Studia Humana 8 (2):47-54 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The paper revisits metaphysical and deontological stances on moral considerability and offers a new criterion for it – “affectability”, that is a capacity of an agent to affect a considered entity. Such an approach results in significant changes in the scope of moral considerability and is relevant for discussing the human position in the Anthropocene. This concept, given especially the assumption of the directness of moral considerability, is also substantial for the decision making process on the ethical, as well as the political plane.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,619

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-12-28

Downloads
19 (#1,061,389)

6 months
7 (#665,875)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

On being morally considerable.Kenneth E. Goodpaster - 1978 - Journal of Philosophy 75 (6):308-325.
Earthing Technology.Vincent Blok - 2017 - Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology (2/3).
Moral considerability and universal consideration.Thomas H. Birch - 1993 - Environmental Ethics 15 (4):313-332.
Toward a Terrestrial Turn in Philosophy of Technology.Pieter Lemmens, Vincent Blok & Jochem Zwier - 2017 - Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology 21 (2/3):114-126.
Moral Considerability: Deontological, not Metaphysical.Benjamin Hale - 2011 - Ethics and the Environment 16 (2):37-62.

View all 7 references / Add more references