A minimal classical sequent calculus free of structural rules

Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 161 (10):1244-1253 (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Gentzen’s classical sequent calculus has explicit structural rules for contraction and weakening. They can be absorbed by replacing the axiom P,¬P by Γ,P,¬P for any context Γ, and replacing the original disjunction rule with Γ,A,B implies Γ,AB.This paper presents a classical sequent calculus which is also free of contraction and weakening, but more symmetrically: both contraction and weakening are absorbed into conjunction, leaving the axiom rule intact. It uses a blended conjunction rule, combining the standard context-sharing and context-splitting rules: Γ,Δ,A and Γ,Σ,B implies Γ,Δ,Σ,AB. We refer to this system as minimal sequent calculus.We prove a minimality theorem for the propositional fragment : any propositional sequent calculus S is complete if and only if S contains. Thus one can view as a minimal complete core of Gentzen’s.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,676

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Contraction-elimination for implicational logics.Ryo Kashima - 1997 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 84 (1):17-39.
Aspects of analytic deduction.Athanassios Tzouvaras - 1996 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 25 (6):581-596.
Natural deduction with general elimination rules.Jan von Plato - 2001 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 40 (7):541-567.
Investigations into a left-structural right-substructural sequent calculus.Lloyd Humberstone - 2007 - Journal of Logic, Language and Information 16 (2):141-171.
Cut-Based Abduction.Marcello D'agostino, Marcelo Finger & Dov Gabbay - 2008 - Logic Journal of the IGPL 16 (6):537-560.
Focusing Gentzen’s LK Proof System.Chuck Liang & Dale Miller - 2024 - In Thomas Piecha & Kai F. Wehmeier (eds.), Peter Schroeder-Heister on Proof-Theoretic Semantics. Springer. pp. 275-313.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-12-18

Downloads
53 (#407,093)

6 months
11 (#334,289)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Dominic Hughes
St. Francis Xavier University

Citations of this work

Fractional semantics for classical logic.Mario Piazza & Gabriele Pulcini - 2020 - Review of Symbolic Logic 13 (4):810-828.
Cut elimination by unthreading.Gabriele Pulcini - 2023 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 63 (1):211-223.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Linear Logic.Jean-Yves Girard - 1987 - Theoretical Computer Science 50:1–102.

Add more references