Abstract

The animating idea behind this book is that “a better understanding of linguistic communication may help us to a better understanding of legal regulation” . While for Marmor the philosophy of language has played a foundational role in the philosophy of law, The Language of Law is concerned more narrowly with “linguistic communication as a means of conveying legal content” . In preliminary statements Marmor foregrounds his interest in “the linguistic aspects of legal directives”, specifically “the boundaries between linguistic and normative considerations in the inference to legal content of statutory law”. The aim is to articulate “how the legal determinants work” . These linguistic questions, Marmor argues, can be considered independently of any theory of law or of the nature of legal philosophy. His assumption is that “we can make some philosophical progress by paying close attention to the kind of speech acts that legal enactments are” . The underlying issue ..