Humans, Animals, and Aristotle. Aristotelian Traces in the Current Critique of Moral Individualism

Labyrinth: An International Journal for Philosophy, Value Theory and Sociocultural Hermeneutics 18 (2):117-136 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The concept of moral individualism is part of the foundational structure of most prominent modern moral philosophies. It rests on the assumption that moral obligations towards a respective individual are constituted solely by her or his capacities. Hence, these obligations are independent of any ἔθος, of any shared ethical sense and social significations. The moral agent and the individual with moral status are construed as subjects outside of any social relation or lifeworld significations. This assumption has been contested in the last decades by diverse authors with very different approaches to moral philosophy. In the last years, an increasing number of philosophers like Cora Diamond and Alice Crary, but also phenomenologists like Paul Ricœur, Klaus Held, and Bernhard Waldenfels question the presupposition that individual capacities are the agent-neutral and context-neutral ground of moral considerations. This critique of moral individualism in different contemporary discourses shows a striking similarity between Wittgensteinian and phenomenological philosophers as their critical inquiry of prominent theories like the ones by Immanuel Kant, John Rawls, Peter Singer or Tom Regan is derived from mostly implicitly efficacious Aristotelian theorems. Telling examples are the ἔθος as pre-given normative infrastructure, the ἕξις as individual internalization of the ethos, the φρόνησις described as a specific practical know-how in contrast to scientific knowledge, and not at least the definition of the human being as ζῷον πολιτικόν. However, the Aristotelian sources of this movement have not yet been scrutinized systematically. This paper aims, first, to reveal the significance of these sources to make them visible and, second, to contribute to the notion of the topicality of Aristotelian philosophy in current debates on ethics.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,369

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-05-30

Downloads
34 (#670,329)

6 months
11 (#358,218)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Martin Huth
University of Vienna

Citations of this work

Introduction.Martin Huth & Gerhard Thonhauser - 2020 - Philosophy Today 64 (3):537-555.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Eating Meat and Eating People.Cora Diamond - 1978 - Philosophy 53 (206):465 - 479.
Eating Meat and Eating People.Cora Diamond & Kenan Professor - 2004 - In Cass R. Sunstein & Martha Craven Nussbaum (eds.), Animal rights: current debates and new directions. New York: Oxford University Press.
Five faces of oppression.Iris Marion Young - 2009 - In George L. Henderson & Marvin Waterstone (eds.), Geographic thought : a praxis perspective. New York: Routledge. pp. 55-71.

View all 11 references / Add more references