Indirect Discrimination and the Hospital Relocation Cases

Journal of Applied Philosophy (forthcoming)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article develops a theory of indirect discrimination by analyzing a series of lawsuits that challenged hospital relocations in the 1970s. In these cases, civil rights groups argued that the relocation of hospitals from cities to suburbs was a form of racial discrimination. Although these lawsuits failed, I aim to support the plaintiffs' arguments that the hospital relocations were discriminatory. Drawing on three recent theories – those of Benjamin Eidelson, Deborah Hellman, and Sophia Moreau – I develop an account of indirect discrimination that is rooted in resource-specific equality rights such as those found in international human rights law. Building on this account, I argue that the human right to health equity can explain why the hospital relocations were discriminatory.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,518

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2024-05-27

Downloads
16 (#1,202,268)

6 months
11 (#364,844)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Brian Hutler
Temple University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references