Mural Sovereignty: From the Twin Towers to the Twin Walls

Law and Critique 20 (2):133-146 (2009)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

After the demolition of the Berlin Wall, the construction of the Palestinian Wall from 2002 and the passing of The Secure Fence Act of 2006 enact a return to mural forms of sovereignty: walls are both without and within law, ‘old solutions’ to problems newly-made. While the Berlin Wall is considered a Cold War monument, both the Palestinian Wall and the ‘Secure Fence’ concretize the paradoxical reappearance of ancient territorializing strategies in a post-Cold War New World Order. These paradoxes are related to the coincidence of intensive and extensive forms of contemporary sovereignty: the contraction of a narrowed sovereign border accompanied by the projection of an extended sovereign power. These mural structures are considered in the context of the renovation of Ground Zero, Franz Kafka’s story ‘The Great Wall of China’, and Dan Perjovschi’s mural ‘What Happened to US?’.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,516

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-07-05

Downloads
9 (#1,517,925)

6 months
4 (#1,240,197)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Security and Terror.Giorgio Agamben & Carolin Emcke - 2001 - Theory and Event 5 (4).
Security and Terror.Agamben Giorgio - 2001 - Theory and Event 5 (4).
Performing the border.Ursula Biemann - 2004 - Multitudes 1 (1):75-90.

Add more references