In defence of “hard” offers: A reply to J.p. Day

Philosophia 20 (3):325-327 (1990)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In commenting on our earlier article in IPhilosophiaD, J P Day raises four issues: those concerning (1) the correct interpretation of the concept of "conditional offers," (2) the relationship of hard conditional offers to liberty, (3) the role of preferences in distinguishing offers from threats, and (4) the moral wrongness of some forms of offering. Two of these points, the second and the third, give rise to some further argument

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,793

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Elements of Constraint.Matti Häyry & Timo Airaksinen - 1988 - Analyse & Kritik 10 (1):32-47.
Being Unfree to and Being Unfree.George E. Panichas - 1979 - Analysis 39 (1):61 - 63.
There are (STILL) no coercive offers.A. Wertheimer & F. G. Miller - 2014 - Journal of Medical Ethics 40 (9):592-593.
What's not wrong with conditional organ donation?T. M. Wilkinson - 2003 - Journal of Medical Ethics 29 (3):163-164.
Comments on Guyer.Allen W. Wood - 2007 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 50 (5):465 – 479.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
51 (#410,235)

6 months
9 (#433,641)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references