Vagueness and Quantification

Journal of Philosophical Logic 45 (5):579-602 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper deals with the question of what it is for a quantifier expression to be vague. First it draws a distinction between two senses in which quantifier expressions may be said to be vague, and provides an account of the distinction which rests on independently grounded assumptions. Then it suggests that, if some further assumptions are granted, the difference between the two senses considered can be represented at the formal level. Finally, it outlines some implications of the account provided which bear on three debated issues concerning quantification.

Other Versions

No versions found

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-10-21

Downloads
932 (#25,975)

6 months
104 (#63,304)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Andrea Iacona
Università di Torino

Citations of this work

Logical Form: Between Logic and Natural Language.Andrea Iacona - 2018 - Cham, Switzerland: Springer Verlag.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Vagueness, truth and logic.Kit Fine - 1975 - Synthese 30 (3-4):265-300.
Generalized quantifiers and natural language.John Barwise & Robin Cooper - 1981 - Linguistics and Philosophy 4 (2):159--219.
Vagueness.Delia Graff & Timothy Williamson (eds.) - 1994 - London and New York: Ashgate.
On Quantifier Domain Restriction.Jason Stanley & Zoltán Gendler Szabó - 2000 - Mind and Language 15 (2-3):219--61.
Conversational Impliciture.Kent Bach - 1994 - Mind and Language 9 (2):124-162.

View all 29 references / Add more references