Mythic and Divine Violence: A Critique of Žižek’s Catastrophic Trajectory

International Journal of Žižek Studies 12 (1) (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In Slavoj Žižek’s work two forms of violence, mythic and divine, are distinguished from one another by virtue of instrumental ends. In the former case violence serves the establishment of the social order, whereas in the latter case, which is non-instrumental, the violence is an expression of pure justice. It is also important to observe that these two forms of violence respond differently to the singularity of our existence, insofar as the instrumental disavows and neutralizes the inhuman dimension that exists within each of us. But if there is something limitless or immeasurable apropos of the inhuman, then such distinctions between the mythic and the divine become problematic. I will therefore contend in the essay below that the catastrophic predictions derived from such distinctions need further interrogation.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,937

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-01-25

Downloads
38 (#593,075)

6 months
8 (#583,676)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Apple Igrek
Oklahoma State University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references