- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
David Hume and Scientific Theism
Journal of the History of Ideas 17 (4):486 (1956)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Other Versions
No versions found
My notes
Similar books and articles
David Hume and Scientific Theism.R. H. Hurlbutt - 1956 - Journal of the History of Ideas 17 (4):486.
HURLBUTT, R. H. - "Hume, Newton and the Design Argument". [REVIEW]G. J. Warnock - 1967 - Mind 76:456.
Hume, Newton and the Design Argument. By Robert H. Hurlbutt III. (University of Nebraska Press, Lincoln, Neb., 1965. Pp. xiv + 222. $5.00.). [REVIEW]E. L. Mascall - 1966 - Philosophy 41 (156):181-.
Robert H. Hurlbutt III, 1925-2004.Robert Audi & Joseph Mendola - 2006 - Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association 79 (5):126 -.
Hume and the Historiography of Science.S. K. Wertz - 1993 - Journal of the History of Ideas 54 (3):411-436.
Hume.Jennifer Smalligan Marušić - 2019 - In Graham Oppy (ed.), A Companion to Atheism and Philosophy. Hoboken: Blackwell. pp. 13–27.
David Hume and Charles Darwin.William B. Huntley - 1972 - Journal of the History of Ideas 33 (3):457.
Analytics
Added to PP
2016-09-07
Downloads
35 (#645,327)
6 months
12 (#294,748)
2016-09-07
Downloads
35 (#645,327)
6 months
12 (#294,748)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
William Robertson and scientific theism.Joshua Ehrlich - 2013 - Modern Intellectual History 10 (3):519-542.
Philo’s Argument from Evil in Hume’s Dialogues X: A Semantic Interpretation. [REVIEW]Anders Kraal - 2013 - Sophia 52 (4):573-592.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-667477cd97-lxkd2 dc2