Russell's earliest interpretation of Cantorian set theory, 1896–1900

Philosophia Mathematica (1):1-31 (1987)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1093/philmat/s2-2.1.1

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Review of "Irving H. Anellis: Guest editor’s introduction: JvH100". [REVIEW]Bernd Buldt - unknown
Review of "Irving H. Anellis: Jean van Heijenoort’s conception of modern logic, in historical perspective". [REVIEW]Bernd Buldt - unknown
Gregory Landini. Zermelo and Russell’s Paradox: Is There a Universal Set?: Correction Notice.Gregory Landini - 2014 - Philosophia Mathematica 22 (1):142-142.
A Note Concerning Irving H. Anellis "Distortions and Discontinuities of Mathematical Progress: A Matter if Style, A Matter of Luck, A Matter of Time, A Matter of Fact".Paul Ernest - 1992 - Philosophica 50 (2):123-125.
Zermelo and Russell's Paradox: Is There a Universal set?G. Landini - 2013 - Philosophia Mathematica 21 (2):180-199.
Bertrand Russell, Philosophical Papers 1896-99.A. D. Irvine - 1995 - Philosophia Mathematica 3 (3):301-301.
Burgess on Plural Logic and Set Theory.O. Linnebo - 2007 - Philosophia Mathematica 15 (1):79-93.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-24

Downloads
112 (#191,743)

6 months
14 (#234,785)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Guest Editor’s Introduction: JvH100. [REVIEW]Irving H. Anellis - 2012 - Logica Universalis 6 (3-4):249-267.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references