ΛCDM and MOND: A debate about models or theory?

Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 89 (C):226-234 (2021)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The debate between ΛCDM and MOND is often cast in terms of competing gravitational theories. However, recent philosophical discussion suggests that the ΛCDM–MOND debate demonstrates the challenges of multiscale modeling in the context of cosmological scales. I extend this discussion and explore what happens when the debate is thought to be about modeling rather than about theory, offering a model-focused interpretation of the ΛCDM–MOND debate. This analysis shows how a model-focused interpretation of the debate provides a better understanding of challenges asso- ciated with extension to a different scale or domain, which are tied to commitments about explanatory fit.

Other Versions

No versions found

Similar books and articles

The Application of Popperian Methodology to Contemporary Cosmology.Anastasiia Lazutkina - 2021 - In Parusniková Zuzana & Merritt David (eds.), Karl Popper's Science and Philosophy. Cham, Switzerland: Springer. pp. 97-117.
Methodological reflections on the MOND/dark matter debate.Patrick M. Duerr & William J. Wolf - 2023 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 101 (C):1-23.
Models in Engineering and Design: Modeling Relations and Directions of Fit.Michael Poznic - 2021 - In Diane P. Michelfelder & Neelke Doorn (eds.), Routledge Handbook of Philosophy of Engineering. Taylor & Francis Ltd. pp. 383-393.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-01-05

Downloads
353 (#79,647)

6 months
92 (#68,003)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Melissa Jacquart
University of Cincinnati

Citations of this work

Nested modalities in astrophysical modeling.Elena Castellani & Giulia Schettino - 2023 - European Journal for Philosophy of Science 13 (1):1-20.

Add more citations

References found in this work

How scientific models can explain.Alisa Bokulich - 2011 - Synthese 180 (1):33 - 45.
How models are used to represent reality.Ronald N. Giere - 2004 - Philosophy of Science 71 (5):742-752.
Model Evaluation: An Adequacy-for-Purpose View.Wendy S. Parker - 2020 - Philosophy of Science 87 (3):457-477.
II—Wendy S. Parker: Confirmation and adequacy-for-Purpose in Climate Modelling.Wendy S. Parker - 2009 - Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 83 (1):233-249.

View all 12 references / Add more references