What does displacement explain, and what do congruence effects show?: A Response to Hofweber

Linguistics and Philosophy 37 (3):269-274 (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This is a brief response to Thomas Hofweber's "Extraction, Displacement and Focus: A Reply to Balcerak Jackson" (Linguistics and Philosophy 37.3 (2014)), which was a reply to my "Defusing Easy Arguments for Numbers" (Linguistics and Philosophy 36.6 (2013)).

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,865

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Conditionals and questions: A reply to Korzukhin.Justin Khoo - 2016 - Linguistics and Philosophy 39 (1):51-55.
Authority Figures Reply.Daniel Groll - 2012 - Hastings Center Report 42 (3):6-7.
Knowledge of language as self-knowledge.John Schwenkler - 2024 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 67 (10):4078-4102.
What generativism is not: A reply to Brian Baigrie.Andrew Lugg - 1991 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 23 (3):499-501.
Schmoughts for Naught? Reply to Vermaire.Matti Eklund - 2023 - Journal of Philosophy 120 (7):392-398.
Defusing easy arguments for numbers.Brendan Balcerak Jackson - 2013 - Linguistics and Philosophy 36 (6):447-461.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-07-25

Downloads
70 (#299,480)

6 months
10 (#399,629)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

References found in this work

Defusing easy arguments for numbers.Brendan Balcerak Jackson - 2013 - Linguistics and Philosophy 36 (6):447-461.
Discourse effects of word order variation.Gregory Ward & Betty J. Birner - 2019 - In Paul Portner, Klaus von Heusinger & Claudia Maienborn (eds.), Semantics: noun phrases, verb phrases and adjectives. Boston: De Gruyter.

Add more references