Roots of Human Resistance to Animal Rights: Psychological and Conceptual Blocks

Animal Law 8:143-176 (2002)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

A combined psychological-epistemological study of the blocks that stand in the way of the human recognition of the sentience and legal rights of non-human animals. Originally published in the Lewis and Clark law journal, Animal Law, and subsequently translated into German and into Portuguese.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-12-14

Downloads
900 (#26,580)

6 months
113 (#53,350)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Steven James Bartlett
Willamette University

Citations of this work

The Idea of a Metalogic of Reference.Steven James Bartlett - 1976 - Methodology and Science: Interdisciplinary Journal for the Empirical Study of the Foundations of Science and Their Methodology 9 (3):85-92.
Self-reference, Phenomenology, and Philosophy of Science.Steven James Bartlett - 1980 - Methodology and Science: Interdisciplinary Journal for the Empirical Study of the Foundations of Science and Their Methodology 13 (3):143-167.
Phenomenology of the Implicit.Steven Bartlett - 1975 - Dialectica 29 (2‐3):173-188.

View all 13 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

The Case for Animal Rights.Tom Regan - 1985 - Human Studies 8 (4):389-392.
Animals and the value of life.Peter Singer - 1980 - In Tom L. Beauchamp & Tom Regan, Matters of life and death. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.

Add more references